Re:Newspapers slam ex-Mozilla CEO's new ad-blocking browser
by woah on Saturday April 09, 2016 @11:51AM
(#11461772)
People will pay for news, as they have for the past few hundred years. All that Internet ads have gotten us is clickbait articles monetized by ads that appear to target only the very stupidest readers. One weird trick to eliminate belly fat.
Re:Newspapers slam ex-Mozilla CEO's new ad-blocking browser
by mc32 on Saturday April 09, 2016 @12:16PM
(#11461883)
Since subscription prices never made enough revenue to make news profitable advertizing always made up for the difference, but if advertizing is no longer a viable revenue model, what's the alternative? Higher subscriptions?
Yeah we could go back to a time when all you had was rumor before ad supported newspapers arrived, is that the world we want to be in where only those who want to support their view and who undertake subsidizing those views get to disseminate news and engage in journalism?
Citizen journalism is not the solution. First they may have bigger biases than professionals and they don't have an editorial board overseeing and critiquing their works, it may be more unbalanced and may have less access to the halls of power. So traditional journalism still appears to have a function.