News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Newspapers slam ex-Mozilla CEO's new ad-blocking browser by Gargoyle on Saturday April 09, 2016 @11:12AM (#11461586)
>I think what scares traditional content-creators is the idea that the vast majority of content has no inherent value.

So you agree to stop consuming it?

Re:Newspapers slam ex-Mozilla CEO's new ad-blocking browser by mikegioia on Saturday April 09, 2016 @11:15AM (#11461606)
I have absolutely no problem not consuming it. I would bet most people consume things not because they want to, but because it's there and easy.

Ask your friends this: would they still read NYT articles if they had to pay 25 cents every time they landed on a new article? Any barrier to entry for the vast majority of people would have a profound impact on what they consume.

Charge people 50 cents for a plastic bag at the bodega and they'll say they don't need the bag. Give it to them for free by default and they'll take 2!

Re:Newspapers slam ex-Mozilla CEO's new ad-blocking browser by Gargoyle on Saturday April 09, 2016 @01:34PM (#11462267)
There's nothing stopping you from not consuming content you feel has no value. So stop.

If you truly feel it has no value, which I doubt.

Re:Newspapers slam ex-Mozilla CEO's new ad-blocking browser by lackbeard on Saturday April 09, 2016 @11:51AM (#11461771)
That's not how the internet works. If they make something accessible over http, I'm free to consume it however I can.
Re:Newspapers slam ex-Mozilla CEO's new ad-blocking browser by Gargoyle on Saturday April 09, 2016 @01:35PM (#11462275)
Sure. But if you truly feel it has no value, why are you consuming it?
Re:Newspapers slam ex-Mozilla CEO's new ad-blocking browser by lackbeard on Saturday April 09, 2016 @01:57PM (#11462409)
Either way, it's orthogonal to the point I'm trying to make.