Since you're shopping around, take a look at Vultr [0]. It's the same price ($5/month) and they've been recommended before by other HNers.

If you're just toying around for now, AWS offers a free 'micro' instance. It's low-powered but enough to run a simple, low-volume site on.

[0]: https://www.vultr.com/

The great thing about vultr is they have Australian based servers at the same price. I can't tell you how nice it is to have a 10ms ping.

You may look at lowendbox.com for some really cheap vps options, performance may not be ideal. Also beware that you might end up in an unsavory ip address range, fine for most things but any emails sent from that ip will most likely fail.

Awesome site, thanks for posting! I'm in the the same boat as the OP and just happened to see this thread pop up while investigating, so this at least serves as a good source for comparisons to relatively more expensive options.

>might end up in an unsavory ip address range

What is that? you mean, like, bots are run from such a range?

Biggest issue is spammers, resulting in anti-spam blacklists blocking the IP ranges, so many mail servers won't accept mail you try to send from there.

Got it now, thanks.

Thanks.

Check OVH [0] ($3.49 is the lowest plan) or for even less, take a look at Time4VPS [1], they have really cheap servers, but I wouldn't use them in production only for dev and private use.

[0]: https://www.ovh.com/us/vps/vps-ssd.xml

[1]: https://www.time4vps.eu/pricing/

Hello,

My name is Roman and I represent Time4VPS. Our storage units can be deployed in production environment. Storage servers apply for 99.95% of SLA guarantee as same as standard VPS.

BTW, after looking a few of the options (both those I found on my own and those mentioned here), I saw that some of them mention things like OpenVZ. I guess that is the virtualization software used. Do we need to know something about the underlying virtualization software / hypervisor that runs the VPS, or is it enough to know Linux? Last VPS I used, I only interacted with Centos, and did not know what the virtualization software was.

There are differences in performance and implementation technology that can affect performance and such, but normal Linux administration techniques should always work. IDK off the top of my head, but OpenVZ guests I think need to run the same kernel version as the host, so that may play into it. KVM and Xen I belive don't have this drawback. OpenVZ doesn't give you dedicated access to resources i.e. it will allow other guests to use what you aren't using which affects performance. KVM and Xen I believe reserve ram and CPUs.

Interesting. Good info, thanks.

You should include your own time in calculating the cost of a VPS host.

Before I discovered Linode and Digital Ocean, I tried to use the free VPS that was developed and maintained by the computer club at my school. It took me hours upon ours to get to an SSH terminal and would have been way cheaper for me to just work a minimum wage job and pay for one maintained by people who had the time to think about user experience rather than exams.

You're saving yourself really some time when using digitalocean, they work without a problem and you know exactly how much you're paying at the end.

When you're a student you can get even 50$ credit through Github https://education.github.com/pack.

In my opinion it's worth it.

>You should include your own time in calculating the cost of a VPS host.

Thanks, good point. I had just started to think, after posting the question, that maybe I shouldn't bother about $5 vs. $2.5 or $3, and instead look at the reliability of the host. As you say, if more of my own time is needed with the cheaper option, it would actually be more expensive.

Digital Ocean for the cost conscious. Linode for the support.

Thanks to all who replied.