Re:Frog and Toad are Cofounders
by kevan on Saturday April 09, 2016 @05:54PM
(#11463533)
One of my relatively new coworkers did this a while ago, the logic was: "We can't deploy until the build is green, and this test is failing, so I'll just skip this test so we can deploy." Great teachable moment
Re:Frog and Toad are Cofounders
by cjcenizal on Saturday April 09, 2016 @03:55PM
(#11462997)
These stories are so well-written! Really captures the original style well. They remind me a bit of the koans from The Codeless Code. The simplicity of the story obscures its "lessons", allowing you to apply the story to your own experiences and draw your own insights.
Re:Frog and Toad are Cofounders
by Dr_tldr on Saturday April 09, 2016 @09:02PM
(#11464270)
This is one of the most delightful things I've seen come out of the tech satire world. It's not snarky or mean, it's not painting a target on anyone, it's just really meaningful and well done. I'll definitely send these to my team, I think they're really accessible stories about common problems in tech culture. Please keep writing them!
Re:Frog and Toad are Cofounders
by somedangedname on Saturday April 09, 2016 @09:37PM
(#11464402)
not painting a target on anyone
Oh, I dunno.
That night when Toad went to bed he thought the biggest thoughts he could think...He thought about bringing free internet to countries like India, so that he could show ads to billions of people
Re:Frog and Toad are Cofounders
by robert_tweed on Saturday April 09, 2016 @09:32PM
(#11464385)
Being outside the US and unfamiliar with the source material, I read several of them as sort of vague but satisfying vignettes, similar to those in Hagakure, or Zen Koans.
Then I discovered the "read more" links and they took on a totally different character.
Re:Frog and Toad are Cofounders
by dpflan on Saturday April 09, 2016 @05:08PM
(#11463339)
I agree: I had the same reaction until I noticed broken phrases and ellipsis (well, and clicked). It's kind of funny because the first few sentences seem good enough when you follow the submitted link...
Re:Frog and Toad are Cofounders
by overgard on Saturday April 09, 2016 @08:46PM
(#11464205)
I'm not sure I've ever seen a story marked "minor". Generaly the "priority" of these things is just based on how annoyed the person filing the story was at the time.
Re:Frog and Toad are Cofounders
by MaulingMonkey on Sunday April 10, 2016 @01:28AM
(#11465040)
I've seen them! Just don't mandate priorities, or be willing to ruthlessly change them as the implementer. Some starting points:
Anything which merely means the publisher won't pay us because it was a milestone deliverable, but which I could see us technically shipping without, is "wontfix."
Anything which will get me fired for not implementing gets to be "minor."
Anything which I will quit over before I can be fired gets to be "major."
Anything which will lead to mass resignations of the entire engineering team gets to be "blocker", but only if it's actually blocking someone else from doing any work whatsoever.
One of my undergrad volunteers is learning Python. I've had to teach him that just because the code runs, it doesn't mean that it is correct.
These are wonderfully painful to read.
Some insightful parables either way, though!
Oh, I dunno.
That night when Toad went to bed he thought the biggest thoughts he could think...He thought about bringing free internet to countries like India, so that he could show ads to billions of people
:-)
Then I discovered the "read more" links and they took on a totally different character.
Pokemon reference?
Ouch.
Anything which merely means the publisher won't pay us because it was a milestone deliverable, but which I could see us technically shipping without, is "wontfix."
Anything which will get me fired for not implementing gets to be "minor."
Anything which I will quit over before I can be fired gets to be "major."
Anything which will lead to mass resignations of the entire engineering team gets to be "blocker", but only if it's actually blocking someone else from doing any work whatsoever.