Re:Technologists have produced a 3D-printed painting in the ...
by narrator on Friday April 08, 2016 @05:07AM
(#11453456)
I am sensing this odd meme developing, which seems to be rampant in the singularity crowd, that a computer imitating a person accurately enough to deceive another human is equivalent to the person being imitated. So much so that it is even considered to have a similar value to that person. As in, "oh good, we have the computer now and we don't need to care that Rembrant (or whomever is being mimicked) is dead anymore".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Technologists have produced a 3D-printed painting in the ...
by 50CNT on Friday April 08, 2016 @06:18AM
(#11453687)
It seems more that we now have a snapshot of Rembrant as he was when he died. Assuming that the man were immortal somehow, his style would continue to progress, each painting building upon the last. If this algorithm were to do that, it'd just be deviating from what we now consider a Rembrant. I don't think we'd appreciate when an algorithm spitting out pictures akin to Picassos Rose Period suddenly decided that Cubism was more his thing.
Re:Technologists have produced a 3D-printed painting in the ...
by sp332 on Friday April 08, 2016 @10:12AM
(#11454746)
The computer didn't learn how to paint or even compose or even choose subjects like Rembrandt did. With the help of a team of experts, it assembled premade parts of Rembrandt's earlier paintings into a fancy collage under tight constraints. The heightmap algorithm was probably more interesting than the one that made the picture.