News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ES6 is beautiful by coldtea on Thursday April 07, 2016 @03:28PM (#11449935)
>Am I the only one to think throwing "difficult to parse" as criticism to a programming language like JS is disingenuous? (...) "Difficult to parse" semantic constructs may be a hurdle for the 1% doing the parsing, but they mean more syntax goodness to help the the other 99% programmers do things pleasantly and succinctly.

You probably got it wrong. When he says "difficult to parse", he means for the programmers using JS -- not for people working on JS parsers.

Besides compiler construction, "parse" is also commonly used to mean "read/understand" some new code.

Re:ES6 is beautiful by ronjouch on Thursday April 07, 2016 @03:32PM (#11449966)
Oh right, thanks for pointing this out :)

In this case, I'd still contradict OP, arguing the same as stevebmark did in a sibling comment: "[...] these syntax details are well thought out, practical, and improve the readability and writability of the language [...]. None of them seen "unnecessary" and teams I've worked on echo this experience."