News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Source code for Lua 5.3 by luchadorvader on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @11:57AM (#11439630)
Why do you say Lua is better designed? And are you comparing classic JS or ES6 JS? I like Lua but there are some things that just annoy me like indexing an array with 1, smaller standard library, etc. I find JS implementation of inheritance, objects, and prototyping better than Lua due to its simplicity.
Re:Source code for Lua 5.3 by ludamad on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @04:26PM (#11441772)
1. Indexing an array with 1 is unfortunate but not a bad design decision in a vacuum, eg for i=1,#size is a very easy to understand loop over valid array indexes. I'll agree that it causes cognitive load in practice.

2. JS has a somewhat broken notion of objects and Lua's implementation is far cleaner while being as powerful. How do you use a JavaScript object as a hashmap? The default try is a potential security hole.