Re:Court: Employers Must Allow Workers to Sit If They Prefer...
by JoshGlazebrook on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @10:45AM
(#11439081)
Here's a weird observation. I recently moved from the Seattle to Austin. In Washington State, every single bank I went to it was open air between the teller and the customer. Here in Austin, the credit union I use has a physical non-transparent wall and you can only see the teller through a video screen and microphone.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Court: Employers Must Allow Workers to Sit If They Prefer...
by koenigdavidmj on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @10:51AM
(#11439133)
How much stabbier is Austin than Seattle?
Re:Court: Employers Must Allow Workers to Sit If They Prefer...
by 6stringmerc on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @11:17AM
(#11439315)
If they're in the rapidly gentrifying area(s) on the East, which have traditionally been rife with poverty and petty crime (they were 10 years ago when I was there and before real estate is what it is now), then I'd answer "A lot more, a lot more stabbier."
Re:Court: Employers Must Allow Workers to Sit If They Prefer...
by lost_my_pwd on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @11:23AM
(#11439354)
Are you sure the teller is really on the other side of that wall?
At my CU there is a teller there 24/7, it's just that after hours it is via video terminal integrated with the ATM piped to some remote office.
Re:Court: Employers Must Allow Workers to Sit If They Prefer...
by pavel_lishin on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @11:11AM
(#11439277)
I've lived in Dallas, Austin and New York, and I've never seen that. Where do you do your banking?