Re:Non-obvious indicators that a transaction might be fraudu...
by cheez on Tuesday April 05, 2016 @11:06PM
(#11436336)
They call it machine learning, so did they apply unsupervised learning to determine these factors? How did they determine these factors were relevant?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Non-obvious indicators that a transaction might be fraudu...
by nickcano on Wednesday April 06, 2016 @02:48PM
(#11440845)
They could have used PCA[1] on their feature set and let a human come up with these; they claim to use machine learning, not that this checklist was generated as a result of machine learning.
Otherwise, maybe they have an algorithm that looked at resulting classifications from learning and flagged inputs with the largest and most consistent variance across classes.
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_component_analysis