Mr. that was not my reply, and I didn't made a angry response... If you thought my characters conveyed angryness I apologize, I just critcized your points.
oops I didn't realise someone else chimed in.
Re your original post, the 'damned' and 'what are you talking about' and not reading my post charitably (that I was lying rather than just reading the site description) seemed rude. Thank you for apologising.
Being able to shim script tag libraries is mentioned in various places through the docs (and used to be even more prominent than it is now).
I'm responding out of charity here: you made an angry response, were shown to have misread the post, and haven't apologised. Be civil.