News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tantrums as Status Symbols (2005) by TheOtherHobbes on Tuesday April 05, 2016 @05:42AM (#11429123)
The same physical seating arrangement can express more than one social dynamic.

The undergrads won't be judging the Nobel Prize winner or asking him/her to justify their work. The prize winner will not be sweating or struggling. The flow of status goes in the other direction - the undergrads are supposed to be grateful that the great prize winner has agreed to spend some time with them.

Entrepreneur and money men conversations could just as easily happen with everyone sitting on sofas. The adversarial panel approach is intended to be challenging and adversarial - which is only possible if those who are doing the challenging have higher status and feel a need to display it.

There's a case to be made for the suggestion that the primary product of the entire global economy is status signalling. Physical and intellectual invention is a useful byproduct, but most things in most corporations and markets seem to happen because one primate subgroup wants to impress, seduce, or intimidate some other primate subgroup.

Re:Tantrums as Status Symbols (2005) by robotresearcher on Tuesday April 05, 2016 @03:01PM (#11433337)
Of course. My point was that the seating arrangement is not the relevant part of the setting.