News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mutt 1.6 by shirro on Monday April 04, 2016 @08:18PM (#11426847)
I am a reluctant Mutt user. I prefer it to webmail but I prefer a good native gui client to either. It is a very flexible solution but is a big investment in configuration and keypress memory for a casual user. It is a relief to see it still being developed. So much seems abandoned these days with the bleed to web and mobile.
Re:Mutt 1.6 by mfincham on Monday April 04, 2016 @08:34PM (#11426924)
Have you tried Sylpheed? It's like mutt for GTK.

http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/en/

Re:Mutt 1.6 by jtietema on Tuesday April 05, 2016 @08:55AM (#11429954)
I configured mutt with the same key bindings as my Fastmail web interface. Solves the muscle memory problem.