Re:A Basic Income Is Smarter Than a Minimum Wage
by dv_dt on Monday April 04, 2016 @04:30PM
(#11425319)
Economics has no particular respect for human self-sufficiency. If businesses can operate with employees just above starvation wages then all sorts of technologically feasible efficiencies are skipped while human suffering is prolonged.
From a practical standpoint, it feels like for a time that capitalism seeking local-optima was perfectly ok in that the efficiencies gained were lifting society all around - and it still seems that way in the world at large.
However, in more mature economies it seems like a different discussion needs to be made because the business actions seem to be divergent from the interests of society - optimizing on the same financial metrics seems merely a shell game of keeping a larger share of the production -- to the point that there is little to no growth in value to most of society.
Re:A Basic Income Is Smarter Than a Minimum Wage
by denim_chicken on Monday April 04, 2016 @05:37PM
(#11425894)
> Laws do have to take into account things like physics and economics
Economics is not even remotely similar to physics in any respect.
Laws do have to take into account things like physics and economics. The latter is the study of scarce resources that have alternative uses and specifically addresses things like the cost of labor and the affect of artificially manipulating it.