Re:Buybacks at $46B a Month Dwarf Everything in U.S. Market ...
by phyalow on Monday April 04, 2016 @01:52AM
(#11419680)
Number of shares doesn't matter, enterprise value does and it doesn't change. Your implying that there would be a further equity issuance which doesn't routinely happen on buybacks.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Buybacks at $46B a Month Dwarf Everything in U.S. Market ...
by eru on Monday April 04, 2016 @08:54AM
(#11421474)
Exactly. If number of shares would matter, share splits would matter.
Re:Buybacks at $46B a Month Dwarf Everything in U.S. Market ...
by JDDunn9 on Monday April 04, 2016 @09:45AM
(#11421812)
Market cap = shares outstanding * share price.
Reducing shares increases the price (while keeping market cap the same). Share splits increases the shares outstanding and decreases the price. So... yes, shares outstanding does matter.
Re:Buybacks at $46B a Month Dwarf Everything in U.S. Market ...
by phyalow on Monday April 04, 2016 @09:53AM
(#11421847)
Now you are confusing outstanding shares with market float. Shares repurchased become treasury stock and are now apart of equity.
Re:Buybacks at $46B a Month Dwarf Everything in U.S. Market ...
by JDDunn9 on Monday April 04, 2016 @10:18AM
(#11422016)
Whether the company destroys the shares or retains them as treasury stock is irrelevant. Investors don't care if their share price went up by 10%, or if they effectively have 1.10 shares.