I think in older GSM-derived systems, the SIM just computed an authenticator based on a nonce provided by the network.
I know for sure that CDMA (IS-95 and 2000) and later AMPS systems supported one-way authentication or not, as selected by the network.
I've heard rumors that attackers have to force a protocol downgrade to something without mutual authentication by jamming the legitimate signal. The other options for the attack would seem to include
- obtaining the secret key value (or a set of authentication vectors) from the legitimate network. Either of these seems more difficult to obtain than the actual locations that the attackers claim to want.
- obtaining K from SIM manufacturers, which has happened [2].
- exploiting implementation defects in SIMs or mobiles.
[1] 3GPP/ETSI TS 133 102 "3G security: security architecture", http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/133100_133199/133102/13....
[2] https://hn.algolia.com/?query=gemalto&sort=byPopularity&pref...
I now also read about "femtocells" used among else by Verizon (which dievices have been hacked) that are used to extend the signal coverage by costumers. It is an interesting topic overall. I think i will dive more into it...
interesting, never saw this kind of typo before, since those two letters are quite far off..
Sorry, i do all kind of weird typos, sometimes i do not spot them.
Here's a list of apps to get cell data: http://wiki.opencellid.org/wiki/Data_sources
If you're using a CDMA phone and are still concerned, you can try modifying your own PRL and blocking carrier updates.
Another app is called aimsicd, I use it personally. Not paranoid, but there's no reason not to use it really. No noticeable drain on battery, and it would be interesting to know if it ever did throw anything.
EDIT: found 2 apps claiming to be able to detect this.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.skibapps.c...
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.srlabs.snoo...