News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Clang vs. GCC – code coverage checking. Parent comment

Re:Clang vs. GCC – code coverage checking by dave2000 on Saturday April 02, 2016 @04:45PM (#11413338)
If you have £40 or so, and a few evenings free, get the C++11 version of the Stroustrup programming language book and see what's changed. Modern C++ looks entirely different to older C++. Templates still a bit scary, so learn them or ignore them.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Clang vs. GCC – code coverage checking by feylikurds on Saturday April 02, 2016 @06:19PM (#11413788)
Yes, but are there still tons of boilerplate? Or is there a 11/14/17 library that incredibly decreases the amount of code needed? For example a HTTP listener with routing?
[ Parent | on HN ]