Re:AGPL != Awesome GPL
by davisp on Saturday February 20, 2010 @11:35PM
(#1140134)
I'm not arguing this at all, that would be 'relicensing' AFAIK. My post was about changing the text of the AGPL itself. And my entire post was that I read that first clause and then thought, "WTF? Can I even make a funny blog post?" and then it became a funny blog post (to me) about me wondering if I could make a funny blog post.
Granted, that's not the first time this conversation has included the (to me) specifier so I may be in the minority on the amusement on this one.
Granted, that's not the first time this conversation has included the (to me) specifier so I may be in the minority on the amusement on this one.