Are you willing to stake your lunch on that interpretation? I read it as "no modifications allowed" as opposed to "modifications require a new name not confusable with the AGPL". I would support the second, but the first interpretation is what actually motivated opening my editor.

Isn't everything a modification of everything else then? I "modified" your comment by deleting it and writing this one.

I propose an experiment where we introduce Levenshtein to a lawyer and see who's head explodes first.