Re:FBI agrees to unlock iPhone for Arkansas prosecutor
by nxzero on Thursday March 31, 2016 @12:39PM
(#11398486)
Given Apple's declined to say what happened with China's "security" requests, but China's allowed them to continue doing business, the FBI's head met with them in China to talk about Apple, etc. -- I believe their enough known to merit Apple and the FBI going on the record regarding what, if anything, happened, and their position on the topic.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FBI agrees to unlock iPhone for Arkansas prosecutor
by Laaw on Thursday March 31, 2016 @01:29PM
(#11398908)
I don't think you know what "evidence" is if you think anything you've said provides evidence of anything specific happening.
Re:FBI agrees to unlock iPhone for Arkansas prosecutor
by nxzero on Thursday March 31, 2016 @02:27PM
(#11399387)
Fine, if my use of evidence upsets you, happy to change it to "known" - since everything I stated above in the comment you're taking issue with is public knowledge.
Second, are you aware of what I mentioned, or you just whipping around HN expressing your opinion without any effort; if so, that's bit above trolling in my opinion.
Lastly, given your username, if you have any affiliation with the government, law enforcement, etc. - in my opinion that should be disclosed in a comment on related topics.