> I disagree, see my comments about astute businessmen not using yes-men above. No worries if we don't agree here. Countries are most certainly businesses. They're in the business of acquiring people who generate money.
Right, but that is assuming that Erdogan is trying to do what is best for the country in the long term. Many would argue his primary concern is Erdogan's interests in the short term.
Former dictators who censored speech don't generally have happy post-political careers. I wouldn't imagine trying to put a strangle hold on a whole country's speech is exactly stress free either.
Whether he is planning for the short term or for his whole life, Erdogan isn't so bright as @gkya would have you believe. He certainly doesn't have the best interests of his country in mind. However, I'll add something else you may not expect me to believe, which is that I believe everyone does things in their own interests. I wouldn't expect anyone to do otherwise. Erdogan's behavior is simply a matter of foresight. He's not seeing his own future clearly.
Ergo, Erdogan isn't bright.
No one - least of all @gkya - is saying he is bright. They are saying his actions aren't stupid.
Former dictators who censored speech don't generally have happy post-political careers.
Plenty have died in office while still holding power, too. Most of Turkey's immediate neighbors have had dictators who died while in power.
Thanks, I see that now. Some of @gkya's words sounded like they take the opposite viewpoint, such as,
>> Speech should not be regulated in any ways
>> Freedom of speech does not mean irresponsible and banale flow of whatever one thinks.
>> freedom of speech must not mean that one can be reckless, inconsiderate and demeaning.
It reads like it was unedited and is very hard to follow
> When one looks at his actions in the light of those motives his actions make a lot of sense. Without those motives his actions appear stupid.
I disagree, see my comments about astute businessmen not using yes-men above. No worries if we don't agree here. Countries are most certainly businesses. They're in the business of acquiring people who generate money.