News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:Ubuntu on Windows by creshal on Thursday March 31, 2016 @04:21AM (#11395718)
> The big difference is that Apple actually doesn't fk their users in the ass.

Like with their SMB support? When, given the choice of complying with the GPL or re-writing an SMB client from scratch, Apple chose the latter and subjected users to utterly broken SMB support for several releases just so they did not have to open source their pitiful collection of patches?

Re:Ubuntu on Windows by recursive on Thursday March 31, 2016 @04:33AM (#11395775)
Apple is pretty user-hostile. Moreso than MS in my estimation. Try changing the battery in your iphone, or getting music on it without using itunes.
Re:Ubuntu on Windows by JoeAltmaier on Thursday March 31, 2016 @11:08AM (#11397706)
Sure. But aren't we past changing batteries? They're less an issue than changing screens these days. And screens have never been easily replaceable. Its just us old folks who expect the battery to come out.
Re:Ubuntu on Windows by recursive on Thursday March 31, 2016 @11:47AM (#11397997)
Those of us that aren't drinking the apple kool aid aren't past changing batteries. And I'm old. Perhaps Apple is just old-person-hostile, which amounts to about the same thing for me.
Re:Ubuntu on Windows by creshal on Thursday March 31, 2016 @05:24AM (#11395935)
> Try changing the battery in your iphone

Try changing the battery in your Lumia.

Re:Ubuntu on Windows by johnchristopher on Thursday March 31, 2016 @07:07AM (#11396264)
My Lumia 640 has replaceable battery. It might be a windows phone though.
Re:Ubuntu on Windows by creshal on Thursday March 31, 2016 @11:06AM (#11397699)
Hah! You're right. Microsoft's own devices actually do all have replaceable batteries, only (most of) the older Nokia-branded Lumias have soldered batteries.
Re:Ubuntu on Windows by toxican on Thursday March 31, 2016 @08:43AM (#11396700)
And I'll try changing it in my Nexus. We're at the point where the inability to change your battery is pretty common place on flagship phones.
[dead]
Re:Ubuntu on Windows by recursive on Thursday March 31, 2016 @11:48AM (#11398003)
Serious.
Re:Ubuntu on Windows by eertami on Thursday March 31, 2016 @04:53AM (#11395838)
>I will happily keep on paying high price for the Apple products in the future too as long as all of my personal data is not being broadcasted

Yeah I'm sure all those celebs that had all their nude photos stolen from icloud would totally agree that Apple takes great care with personal data.

Are you trying to justify needlessly spending 600$ on a phone every year? That's your prerogative, you don't have to convince strangers on the internet.

Re:Ubuntu on Windows by rdsnsca on Thursday March 31, 2016 @06:42AM (#11396159)
Apples security was not breached, those celebrities fell for a phishing scam.
Re:Ubuntu on Windows by riotdash on Thursday March 31, 2016 @05:05AM (#11395872)
"Yeah I'm sure all those celebs that had all their nude photos stolen from icloud would totally agree that Apple takes great care with personal data."

All systems have had and still have security flaws. There is a world of difference between having a unknown vulnerability (which affects and will affect all platforms) and intentionally spying on users and stealing their information.

Re:Ubuntu on Windows by nxzero on Thursday March 31, 2016 @05:47AM (#11395999)
All systems have flaws at some point, but not all systems equal in terms of exploitable value for the effort.