News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Spotify raises $1B in debt with devilish terms to fight A... by danieltillett on Tuesday March 29, 2016 @11:58PM (#11386869)
You shouldn’t need a diversity officer to stop your business being inhospitable to employees on the basis of background - this should be core to your business culture. It is like having a come-to-work-and-get-stuff-done officer.
Re:Spotify raises $1B in debt with devilish terms to fight A... by jrowley on Wednesday March 30, 2016 @12:03AM (#11386889)
Well I agree, ideally this should be automatic and inherent to a business, but when a company gets to a certain size you need people to be really thoughtful and consciously focused about this stuff, otherwise it can slip. So sometimes growth necessitates a dedicated person thinking about these issues.
Re:Spotify raises $1B in debt with devilish terms to fight A... by p4wnc6 on Wednesday March 30, 2016 @12:31AM (#11386977)
More often, the person is just a token hire who functions more to ensure legal deniability on the company's part for anything that might pop up related to a diversity issue.

I hope more companies hire diversity officers for the sake of thinking hard about how to ensure that policies and company behaviors aren't harmful.

But for me it's a "I'll believe it when I see it" sort of thing. The default belief has to be that it's just a token position for the sake of legal deniability, just as most of HR has evolved into.

Re:Spotify raises $1B in debt with devilish terms to fight A... by LoSboccacc on Wednesday March 30, 2016 @02:49AM (#11387404)
Yup. I've yet to see a diversity office having an actual budget and spending power.