Re:Moving Beyond the OOP Obsession
by scomment on Monday March 28, 2016 @11:28AM
(#11374819)
Okaaaaaaay, so if we left everything what OOP gived us (properties^1, generics, lot of good patterns^2, lot of abstractions for generic things, like interface^3, events, higher level datastructures, delegates, namespaces, modules^4 etc.) then we get C? Omg, thank you Captian Obvious! Learn OOP first.
What a bullshit article.
1) C++ for OO example? Seriously, why??? Grab a modern language who have properties at least. Even Delphi had it!
2) IMHO without OO patterns OOP worth nothing
3) I know, you can do interfaces in C++ with pure virtual classes, but you miss the abstraction behind that.
4) Java JAR, .NET assemblies, no matter what they called.
What a bullshit article.
1) C++ for OO example? Seriously, why??? Grab a modern language who have properties at least. Even Delphi had it!
2) IMHO without OO patterns OOP worth nothing
3) I know, you can do interfaces in C++ with pure virtual classes, but you miss the abstraction behind that.
4) Java JAR, .NET assemblies, no matter what they called.