$89 pocket oscilloscope

Re:$89 pocket oscilloscope by aarongough on Friday February 19, 2010 @09:39AM (#1136992)

Thanks for that reference to the Leica M digital cameras! I have been looking for a manual digital camera for a long time, but had never come across those!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$89 pocket oscilloscope by ugh on Friday February 19, 2010 @10:13AM (#1137077)

Did you look at the prices yet? Expecially at lens prices? If not, prepare for sticker shock.

Not to say Leica M cameras aren't worth it, they just aren't for everyone.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$89 pocket oscilloscope by aarongough on Friday February 19, 2010 @10:25AM (#1137107)

Yeah no kidding! $5k and upward... I knew they would be expensive, but I wasn't expecting that!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$89 pocket oscilloscope by tesseract on Friday February 19, 2010 @10:06AM (#1137063)

Panasonic L1 and LC1, also.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$89 pocket oscilloscope by aarongough on Friday February 19, 2010 @10:27AM (#1137113)

Thanks for that! I hadn't seen those either!

At the moment I'm still using my Pentax ME Super (which I love!) Personally I really wish someone would manufacture a simple 35mm digital adaptor, maybe something that used the film roll cavity for electronics and then had a simple, thin tongue containing the sensor that would take the place of the actual film?

Oh well...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$89 pocket oscilloscope by tesseract on Friday February 19, 2010 @08:34PM (#1138445)

I would love to have something like that for my manual Canon. (A "digital back" that would replace the rear cover might work too, although it would obviously be more tightly tied to a specific camera model.)

[ Parent | on HN ]