News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Big Alien Theory. Parent comment

Re:The Big Alien Theory by pklausler on Saturday March 26, 2016 @10:00PM (#11368498)
My original point stands. We haven't observed vN-B probes. This negative result is useful in a Bayesian way; it makes it less likely that the galaxy is full of tech civilizations, and makes other possibilities more likely, including several that you mentioned in a needlessly belligerent fashion.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Big Alien Theory by fergussimpson on Monday March 28, 2016 @01:32PM (#11375746)
Ah, but take a look at this chart:

https://xkcd.com/1633/

For anything more than 10^6 km away and less than 10 metres in size, we just wouldn't see it. We have only just noticed some enormous lumps on Ceres, and it seems a whole planet has evaded detection until now.

I don't think it's particularly likely we will find a vN probe. But to consider their non-detection to be of statistical significance is, I think, an overestimation of our technological capabilities.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Big Alien Theory by pklausler on Monday March 28, 2016 @02:59PM (#11376469)
vN-B probes are not passive objects. They would have observable effects from mining and propulsion, at least.
[ Parent | on HN ]