Re:Poor Software QA Is Root Cause of TAY-Fail (Microsoft's A...
by Davesjoshin on Saturday March 26, 2016 @03:00PM
(#11366916)
How do we know that QA didn't report the issues? QA reporting a bug and that bug being fixed are two different things right?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Poor Software QA Is Root Cause of TAY-Fail (Microsoft's A...
by dllthomas on Saturday March 26, 2016 @03:37PM
(#11367080)
I would distinguish between "QA as a process" and "QA as a role". We don't know that people in the Quality Assurance role failed; we can observe that the process intended to assure quality did.
Re:Poor Software QA Is Root Cause of TAY-Fail (Microsoft's A...
by MrMeritology on Saturday March 26, 2016 @06:34PM
(#11367778)
OP here. Agreed. I'll modify my post to clarify that I'm talking about "QA as a process", which usually involves people with "QA as a role", but not always.
Re:Poor Software QA Is Root Cause of TAY-Fail (Microsoft's A...
by Davesjoshin on Saturday March 26, 2016 @04:04PM
(#11367210)
I think that's a good distinction. This could be considered a process failure. QA works only if the process allows it to work.