Re:Red Programming Language: 0.6.0: Red GUI System
by mhd on Saturday March 26, 2016 @06:15AM
(#11365120)
Rebol itself was open sourced a while ago, but IIRC that didn't include the GUI system, and few third parties seem to be interested. Last update to the github repo [1] was two years ago…
If we're talking about Amiga almuni projects, DragonFlyBSD seems to be the healthier one.
Re:Red Programming Language: 0.6.0: Red GUI System
by draegtun on Saturday March 26, 2016 @07:14AM
(#11365242)
For Rebol 3 GUI binaries / source code go to Atronix Rebol - http://www.atronixengineering.com/downloads/
For latest community development see Ren/C - https://github.com/metaeducation/ren-c
For latest bugs/sugs see - https://github.com/rebol/rebol-issues
Re:Red Programming Language: 0.6.0: Red GUI System
by nickpsecurity on Saturday March 26, 2016 @11:48AM
(#11366054)
"If we're talking about Amiga almuni projects, DragonFlyBSD seems to be the healthier one."
I've never heard it referenced in connection to Amiga. How is it related?
Re:Red Programming Language: 0.6.0: Red GUI System
by hansjorg on Saturday March 26, 2016 @01:15PM
(#11366451)
It was started by Matthew Dillon, known for several prominent pieces of Amiga software, like the DICE C compiler.
I've never used it, but supposedly several DragonFly features were inspired by AmigaOS.
Re:Red Programming Language: 0.6.0: Red GUI System
by nickpsecurity on Sunday March 27, 2016 @12:58PM
(#11370574)
It's here in the "Not a microkernel" section:
I have suspected that a well-enough designed programming language could subsume many programming tasks that are currently different languages or data formats. There are so many. It looks like Red is attempting to tackle that problem directly - I'm curious what headway can be made.