More Encryption, More Notifications, More Email Security

Re:More Encryption, More Notifications, More Email Security by skybrian on Friday March 25, 2016 @09:41PM (#11364032)

Yes, that's what happens when the government and the company don't work out any compromise. In the end, if you stonewall and the judge agrees, the government gets to use coercion and shut you down. There are worse things (they could raid your datacenter or fine you or put you in jail).

In the happier case (with better lawyers), a legal procedure gets worked out where the company checks that the search warrants are valid, law enforcement gets the info they want, the company keeps their private key, the government doesn't get to install any hardware, and companies publish "transparency reports" showing that mass surveillance isn't happening.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:More Encryption, More Notifications, More Email Security by nickpsecurity on Friday March 25, 2016 @10:29PM (#11364186)

Those are the ones you hear about. Then tgere's the ECI level Snowden leaks on US companies "SIGINT enabling" their products. It said the FBI "compelled" those that resisted. SIGINT enabling is backdoors. The method of compelling isnt revealed. And Lavabit case was similarly expected ti keep secret of it all.

So, you are told that it happens as you describe. We cant be assured of tgat given leaks.

[ Parent | on HN ]