News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is LambdaConf for Conservative Christians, Too? by lhnz on Friday March 25, 2016 @09:30PM (#11363985)
He seems like a nice, reasonable guy. I actually think that he's more tolerant than most people, and that the radical left could learn something from him.
Re:Is LambdaConf for Conservative Christians, Too? by pklausler on Friday March 25, 2016 @09:36PM (#11364010)
As opposed to the radical right, you mean?
Re:Is LambdaConf for Conservative Christians, Too? by lhnz on Friday March 25, 2016 @09:40PM (#11364028)
In this particular case it's the radical left that is irate, so yes.

Also, in general the radical right (when this is used to refer to neoreaction) tends to just opine with long blog posts where they capitalise words like Tradition, Civilization and Enlightenment. They don't like to angrily point fingers as they feel this is unbecoming of gentlemen/women. (I'm being honest about their pretensions here.)

Re:Is LambdaConf for Conservative Christians, Too? by pklausler on Friday March 25, 2016 @09:45PM (#11364051)
Attendees at Trump rallies are not exactly known for writing long blog posts, suggestively capitalized or not.
Re:Is LambdaConf for Conservative Christians, Too? by lhnz on Friday March 25, 2016 @09:51PM (#11364084)
...? You are aware that all of this drama relates to the creator of Neoreaction, right?

That vein of the Right has little to do with Trump rallies. It's this kind of stuff: http://thefutureprimaeval.net/ (and more generally: http://www.socialmatter.net)

My description is apt.

Re:Is LambdaConf for Conservative Christians, Too? by pklausler on Friday March 25, 2016 @09:56PM (#11364093)
Thanks for the link and the clarification!
Re:Is LambdaConf for Conservative Christians, Too? by wtbob on Saturday March 26, 2016 @01:12PM (#11366433)
I don't think that attendees at Trump rallies really count as right wing, but rather as populist.