> anything that's developed to the point where it actually works ceases to be "AI.
Hmm, I've not heard of this happening. Do you have any examples of it?
> In any case, it doesn't matter what you call it. Current research is producing results that can improve these systems, which means that research is worth a lot of money.
I don't see how this really adds to or is relevant to my comment, I was simply restating and adding to hitekker's point that AI is improperly named.
In any case, it doesn't matter what you call it. Current research is producing results that can improve these systems, which means that research is worth a lot of money.