News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Big Alien Theory by marcus_holmes on Thursday March 24, 2016 @11:55AM (#11353813)
I don't get the stats here:

- I am an ordinary sentient being (for the sake of argument... just nod)

- I am a member of an ordinary species.

according this theory one of these statements is wrong.

Re:The Big Alien Theory by fergussimpson on Thursday March 24, 2016 @12:06PM (#11353926)
Indeed, in fact in most situations it's impossible to be both an ordinary individual and be in an ordinary group.

Hypothetically, let's imagine there were 10 normal-sized planets with 10 people each, and 1 big planet with 1 million. In this scenario everyone is either on a strange (big) planet, or they are on a normal planet but they are not typical individuals, because over 99% live on the big planet.

Re:The Big Alien Theory by wrsh07 on Thursday March 24, 2016 @12:32PM (#11354191)
Analogy time:

- I am an ordinary human

- I live in an ordinary country

One of these is wrong, and it's the second one.

Re:The Big Alien Theory by marcus_holmes on Thursday March 24, 2016 @01:16PM (#11354580)
yeah OK that makes sense.

So what about:

- Humans are an ordinary species

- Humans live in an ordinary galaxy

Does that change our relative height?

Re:The Big Alien Theory by wrsh07 on Thursday March 24, 2016 @06:41PM (#11357086)
I see what you're trying to do, but it doesn't work. Our arguments need to be like the Doomsday argument, presented here: https://what-if.xkcd.com/65/

If most species looked at themselves and said "my species is ordinary" the majority of them would be right; however, it doesn't give you any statistical reason to think that humans are ordinary.

Re:The Big Alien Theory by marcus_holmes on Thursday March 24, 2016 @10:41PM (#11358188)
that was fascinating, thanks :)

The counter-intuitiveness of it all is really intriguing. We really are evolved to think in small numbers.

Re:The Big Alien Theory by deciplex on Thursday March 24, 2016 @12:05PM (#11353918)
According the reasoning here it's the second one that's wrong (or rather, unlikely).

btw fergussimpson your posts are showing up dead but then are getting undeaded after a certain period of time I guess. Your first post here was dead for a while and now it isn't. Your reply to this parent is dead as of writing this post. I guess it's because you have a new account - I wasn't aware we were auto-hellbanning people now, though. How annoying.

Re:The Big Alien Theory by fergussimpson on Thursday March 24, 2016 @01:21PM (#11354606)
Hmm that's unfortunate. How do I become un-dead?!
Re:The Big Alien Theory by YeGoblynQueenne on Thursday March 24, 2016 @09:40PM (#11357942)
I Am Not A Necromancer, but I believe the process involves some sort of blood sacrifice and, in some cultures, a certain amount of chanting. Dancing may also be involved, or at the very least the rattling of bone talismans.

Hth.

Re:The Big Alien Theory by arjie on Thursday March 24, 2016 @01:24PM (#11354630)
What's likely happening is someone's vouching for your comments. I did that for your other one.

You should rapidly become considered a normal user, but I'm told emailing HN is what you do if you continue to be auto marked dead.

Re:The Big Alien Theory by YeGoblynQueenne on Thursday March 24, 2016 @09:42PM (#11357951)
How do you vouch for someone? I can't see an option - is it like flagging?
Re:The Big Alien Theory by DanBC on Thursday March 24, 2016 @09:49PM (#11357979)
Click the time stamp of the comment and the vouch link should show.

You need a karma level of 30 for the flag / vouch links to appear. You need to have showdead turned on to see the comments that have been flagged.

Here are two comments from dang about it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10638699

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10478886#up_10480270