News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Require-from-Twitter by logn on Thursday March 24, 2016 @02:30AM (#11350975)
A developer gets upset at unilateral actions by NPM resulting in a project being renamed or taken down unnecessarily (potentially breaking builds). So this dev decides to take down all their projects, as a sort of protest. This breaks a lot of builds. The JavaScript community thinks a clever solution is utilizing Twitter as part of the build process? Because then everything would be dependent on Twitter not adding an "edit tweet" button...
Re:Require-from-Twitter by pandler on Thursday March 24, 2016 @02:33AM (#11350991)
> The JavaScript community thinks a clever solution is utilizing Twitter as part of the build process?

The JavaScript community thinks a hilarious, tongue-in-cheek solution is utilizing Twitter as part of the build process.

FTFY

Re:Require-from-Twitter by logn on Thursday March 24, 2016 @02:48AM (#11351038)
Oops. I retract my comment and denounce myself.
Re:Require-from-Twitter by mbrock on Thursday March 24, 2016 @02:57AM (#11351066)
...and then someone on Hacker News implies that the playing around of a single individual represents what "the JavaScript community thinks"...
Re:Require-from-Twitter by orangegrain on Thursday March 24, 2016 @02:33AM (#11350987)
Lol they are so far ahead of you. It's a jab at the situation.
Re:Require-from-Twitter by hisham_hm on Thursday March 24, 2016 @02:32AM (#11350983)
It was a joke.