News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf by AKrumbach on Wednesday March 23, 2016 @05:39PM (#11348491)
If your conference will dis-invite / "de-platform" people based on their opinion about topic {foo}, you are in fact hosting a conference about {foo}, regardless of what your name, official agenda, or spokespeople say.

Kudos to LambdaConf for actually keeping on focus in the face of dissent.

Re:Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf by hythloday on Wednesday March 23, 2016 @06:46PM (#11348901)
Well, this works the other way around too, right? If you invite, or accept applications from, someone who is primarily noted for {bar}, then whatever your name, official agenda, or spokespeople say, you are now hosting a conference tolerant or supportive of {bar}.

You seem to be making a declaration that acts are inherently political, and I'm all for that. It's just that the standard works both ways.

Re:Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf by EdHominem on Wednesday March 23, 2016 @07:52PM (#11349387)
The participants were picked in a blinded process, and the participant in question agreed to leave their personal politics at the door as they would at work.

So not in this case.

Re:Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf by TabAtkins on Thursday March 24, 2016 @01:07AM (#11350706)
I mean, okay, maybe, but that just means that they'd be hosting a conference about "nazis suck" and hey, I'm okay with that. That's a message I can get behind.
Re:Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf by ubertaco on Thursday March 24, 2016 @08:19AM (#11352179)
So what you're saying is, you're cool with discrimination, so long as it's not against you.

So when someone decides to hold a dev conference but chooses to disallow any gay/lesbian developers, is that also totally okay?

Re:Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf by zahmahkibo on Thursday March 24, 2016 @09:11AM (#11352425)
Yes, I am perfectly okay with discriminating against Nazis.

Since when is ALL discrimination bad? I discriminate against shitty people all the time, and so do you. Don't even pretend you don't, no one will believe you.

Re:Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf by ubertaco on Thursday March 24, 2016 @07:46PM (#11357462)
>and so do you. Don't even pretend you don't, no one will believe you.

You're projecting a bit. I try hard -- consciously -- not to shut down and shut out people who need grace as much as I do (either more or less externally-visibly).

Your own code of ethics is not universal. There are people who think and operate differently from you.

Which is exactly the point of not discriminating whenever it's avoidable.

Re:Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf by zahmahkibo on Thursday March 24, 2016 @08:51PM (#11357769)
Your code of grace is also not universal and is almost certainly the minority.
Re:Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf by 13thLetter on Thursday March 24, 2016 @02:28PM (#11355144)
What if they wanted to host a conference about technology? Are they allowed to do that?
Re:Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf by DrDimension on Sunday March 27, 2016 @09:33PM (#11372265)
My god, could you imagine such a thing taking place?! It would be the end of all things.
Re:Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf by EdHominem on Wednesday March 23, 2016 @07:48PM (#11349361)
Kudos are actually due to all the normal people, outside the echo-chamber. Who not only declined to participate in fear or politics but in many cases wrote movingly about the value of open access.
Re:Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf by zahmahkibo on Thursday March 24, 2016 @09:09AM (#11352416)
All life is political. Sorry that hurts your feelings.