Re:School used student laptop webcams to spy on them at scho...
by cgranade on Thursday February 18, 2010 @11:15AM
(#1134466)
As opposed to pocket electronics with integrated microphones? Think of all the embarassment that has occured due to pocket dialing, and now consider if that had been intentional. It's harder to block a microphone than a camera lens, too, and less obvious where the microphone is.
Re:School used student laptop webcams to spy on them at scho...
by f_sav on Thursday February 18, 2010 @11:25AM
(#1134504)
True. At least with cameras there's an obvious way of disabling it.
Yet there's just no enough market pressure to get manufacturers to include a clear electronic switch-off mechanism. Maybe with a few more stories like this one...
Re:School used student laptop webcams to spy on them at scho...
by cgranade on Thursday February 18, 2010 @11:32AM
(#1134523)
I think one reason for that is because of the sheer number of sensors included in modern devices. It would greatly clutter interfaces and physical form factors to include privacy switches for each kind of sensor.
Re:School used student laptop webcams to spy on them at scho...
by f_sav on Thursday February 18, 2010 @12:03PM
(#1134607)
Makes sense (esp. these last few years where device come with the least physical switch possible, e.g. the iPhone), but given the benefit, I personally wouldn't mind the added clutter.
One good first step would be to cut the link to the microphone on lid close (for a laptop or a cellphone, say). Or have a global "privacy switch" which would still allow apps to run to but electrically cut off the privacy-invading sensors (mostly gps, camera, microphone... other?).
Just dreaming out loud here...
I may sound paranoid, but having integrated cameras in almost every electronic device around, with no easy physical (vs. software) way of blocking it somehow, is a recipe for such situations happening one day or the other (of course that doesn't make it any more OK).