Re:$115M verdict in Hulk Hogan sex-tape lawsuit could wipe o...
by dllthomas on Saturday March 19, 2016 @12:53PM
(#11319247)
> But you shouldn't be able to photograph me in my own home whilst I'm naked and having a shower, and certainly not without my consent.
Did you intend the implication that, if I had your consent, I probably still shouldn't be able to photograph you in the shower?
Let's rephrase this:
Do you think that a publication should be able to publish facts about a person that are in the public interest?
Do you think that a publication should be able to publish facts about a person that were obtained illegally but were given to the publication, and that are in the public interest?
Do you think that a publication should be able to publish facts about a person without their consent, when it is in the public interest?
Yes, I do. But you shouldn't be able to photograph me in my own home whilst I'm naked and having a shower, and certainly not without my consent. Nor should you be able to do this to Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton.
Nor should you be allowed to make these photos by breaking into my house and installing a miniature camera in my bathroom.