Re:Why smart people are better off with fewer friends
by mchahn on Friday March 18, 2016 @08:06PM
(#11316339)
> primitive cultures live[d] as long as we do
BTW, an extremely minor point: I intentionally used present-tense because primitive cultures still exist.
Re:Why smart people are better off with fewer friends
by thaumasiotes on Monday March 21, 2016 @12:34AM
(#11326265)
Well, any culture existing today is by definition a modern culture. But, more substantively:
There are no cultures today which are comparable to primitive cultures of the past. One nice point I've seen made is that when hunter-gatherers were the rule, they could live on arable land. After the advent of agriculture, obviously, that became impossible.
Re:Why smart people are better off with fewer friends
by mchahn on Friday March 18, 2016 @07:52PM
(#11316267)
> This means that life expectancy was short.
Surely you know what I meant. If you made it to middle-age you lived just as long.
Re:Why smart people are better off with fewer friends
by wonderlust on Friday March 18, 2016 @08:06PM
(#11316338)
The highest age was about the same, but they were more likely to die at every age than we are today. A 40 year old still could expect a shorter average life than a 40 year old today.
This means that life expectancy was short. It directly conflicts with
> short life expectancy is a myth, and that primitive cultures live[d] as long as we do