Re:Why smart people are better off with fewer friends
by baddox on Friday March 18, 2016 @07:35PM
(#11316169)
It's not snarky. People who seem to me to be qualified and serious have suggested both that the initial converts to agriculture were less healthy and happy than their hunter-gatherer contemporaries, and that modern humans are less happy than hunter-gatherers. The first claim seems very plausible to me, but the second claim seems less so.
Re:Why smart people are better off with fewer friends
by mchahn on Friday March 18, 2016 @07:37PM
(#11316183)
> the initial converts to agriculture were less healthy and happy
Land ownership and class separation didn't start until agriculture.
Re:Why smart people are better off with fewer friends
by the_cat_kittles on Friday March 18, 2016 @07:28PM
(#11316127)
suprising observation from an intro anthropology course i took in college: when you add up all the time it takes you to feed yourself now (including time spent working to earn money etc) vs then, most people spent much less time per week back then. granted, this might not be true for the typical software engineer. but maybe if you somehow account for the years that it took to acquire the skills, it might be close...?
Or was your comment meant to be snark that I didn't get?