SQLite with a Fine-Toothed Comb

Re:SQLite with a Fine-Toothed Comb by advisedwang on Friday March 18, 2016 @03:46PM (#11314376)

UB = undefined behaviour for anyone else who didn't get the unspecified acronym at first glance.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SQLite with a Fine-Toothed Comb by SixSigma on Saturday March 19, 2016 @06:24AM (#11317991)

It is defined at first use :

Here I try to depict the various categories of undefined behaviors (UBs)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SQLite with a Fine-Toothed Comb by advisedwang on Monday March 21, 2016 @04:22PM (#11331597)

Huh, I didn't see that when I first read the article. Maybe it was added or maybe I just missed it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SQLite with a Fine-Toothed Comb by thefifthsetpin on Tuesday March 22, 2016 @04:31PM (#11339752)

He amended the article after getting comments like yours.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SQLite with a Fine-Toothed Comb by sshykes on Friday March 18, 2016 @08:27PM (#11316461)

Thanks. I'm sure many of us will come here to complain about it then immediately benefit from the info you've provided!

I wish authors would qualify more of their exotic initialisms in general.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SQLite with a Fine-Toothed Comb by adrianN on Saturday March 19, 2016 @03:05AM (#11317647)

UB is not really exotic in the field of C correctness.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SQLite with a Fine-Toothed Comb by masklinn on Saturday March 19, 2016 @05:13AM (#11317871)

Or the field of C in general.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SQLite with a Fine-Toothed Comb by choward on Tuesday March 22, 2016 @03:45PM (#11339424)

It's not an acronym. It's an initialism unless you are actually pronouncing it "ub".

[ Parent | on HN ]