Also I am sounding like a downer... I'm sorry about that. My strong opinions can often be too much, and I get that because they might sound negative. I am saying the things as a long time Slack user that gave up.
So what is missing from what Slackware currently offers that would make have 'the community' to you?
What would you like them to do differently in their approach? What could they do differently that would engage you better?
There is an owner's manual and a community of other enthusiasts. If you want more convenience, your best bet is to try a different make and model.
I'd appreciate it if next time just you would just say "I'm just complaining" so I know not to waste my time.
It was announced in Tue Sep 16 11:20:30 PDT 2003 that it's a part of 'extra' repository. So, not installed by default, but it's there.
Announcent on Fri Nov 21 13:51:57 CST 2008 says it was moved from extra/ to ap/, meaning installed by default on all except the most stripped down installs.
Also, there's nothing special in using third party tools as package managers, they all use slackwares pkg tools under the hood. Think (apt<->slackpkg, dpkg -i <-> installpkg, dpkg -r <-> removepkg, etc etc etc).
"Slackware is designed around the idea that the system should be a complete installation kept updated with any official patches. This avoids the mess of dependencies that some other Linux based GNU systems face."
Why remake the website? The website is clear enough, has links to the Slackware Book and to a mailing list.