Re:Another Way of Looking at Lee Sedol vs. AlphaGo
by sguwwochqbib on Thursday March 17, 2016 @12:45PM
(#11305571)
Also, did I say that disagreed with AI ? No. I didn't. I'm all in favour of AI and I expect one day that it will be comparable in terms of energy consumption, generality and other measures we could invent. But for now, amazing though it is, this is not such a huge achievement as it's been made-out to be.
Re:Another Way of Looking at Lee Sedol vs. AlphaGo
by sguwwochqbib on Thursday March 17, 2016 @12:40PM
(#11305523)
sorry, you must have misread my comment I was talking about energy not money, but whatever
In contrast, making a Lee Sedol will never be cheaper, and he lacks all of the other myriad advantages of software, like being instantly clonable and continuously improvable. You will never be able to mash up Shusaku and Sedol to see what they do, train them against each other for subjective millennia, examine the internals of their position evaluation, increase or decrease the sizes of their brains, compress them into much smaller neural nets, combine with other algorithms like MCTS, etc. Energy consumption is among the least important aspects of AI at the moment. We are not in a situation where we know how to make a feasible human-level AI but because electricity costs 10 cents/kwh no one can run, but they could if electricity cost 5 cents/kwh...