Re:Open Sourcers Race to Build Better Versions of Slack
by cyphar on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @05:58PM
(#11301002)
Right, but surely if you're selling it that's much more incentive for a cease and a desist (regardless of whether it is free software).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Open Sourcers Race to Build Better Versions of Slack
by rekoros on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @06:05PM
(#11301040)
Actually I don't think so. The main thing the owners of big networks are afraid of is spam.
We provide a ridiculously expensive way to connect, say, Slack to Skype, which is ==great for Skype==, from almost every possible angle. It means Skype users can stay on Skype instead of switching to someone else's Slack team.
Re:Open Sourcers Race to Build Better Versions of Slack
by taurath on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @10:03PM
(#11302124)
In that case great for skype, bad for slack. Someone, somewhere will decide they'd rather force those customers to use their service/client, or else they'd have an open protocol in the first place.
Re:Open Sourcers Race to Build Better Versions of Slack
by rekoros on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @10:16PM
(#11302172)
There's a huge compliance problem with working in someone else's Slack team -- you own none of the resulting data and you don't control access on your end.
Email is much better in this way, since everyone gets a copy.
With Sameroom you essentially retain the carbon copy semantics of email, but with real-time collaboration. So, I'd argue that it's great for Slack.