News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Qt 5.6.0 released by Ramiuz on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @02:30PM (#11299601)
Will it be worth it/extremely hard to learn C++ just to use Qt? (I always read here and reddit about how hard/inefficient/easy to fail is everything is in C++)

(Eng. background and software dev full time)

Re:Qt 5.6.0 released by sevensor on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @04:28PM (#11300416)
If you just want to use Qt, I recommend PyQt / Python. But there are worse ways to learn C++ than via Qt, if learning C++ is your goal.
Re:Qt 5.6.0 released by 1and2equals0 on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @03:23PM (#11299995)
Worth it if you need to use a cross-platform desktop framework and don't like java. C++ is most definitely harder to use than many (newer, thus) more modern languages but you will be rewarded by the niceness of Qt.
Re:Qt 5.6.0 released by pzone on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @03:31PM (#11300038)
C++ is certainly difficult, but if your expectations are mainly based on Reddit's opinion of C++, probably the language is not as bad as you think.
Re:Qt 5.6.0 released by ta0967 on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @02:57PM (#11299803)
C++ is worth knowing, if only superficially, without any regard for Qt.
Re:Qt 5.6.0 released by Koshkin on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @06:15PM (#11301091)
I am not sure about that. Not in the sense of gaining wisdom as would be in case of, say, Lisp or Haskell -- or even C. C++ is all just nuts and bolts, a more or less coherently implemented collection of paradigms originated in other languages. It is very useful from the practical standpoint, no doubt, but being "worth knowing", "superficially" - not so much IMHO.
Re:Qt 5.6.0 released by joezydeco on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @09:57PM (#11302114)
Thankfully Qt doesn't go very deep into C++. I've shipped entire GUis without a single template.