Re:Handful of Biologists Went Rogue and Published Directly t...
by eru on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @07:16PM
(#11293783)
What about something like markdown plus some syntax for formulas? You can compile the markdown (via a detour to LaTeX perhaps) to something that looks nice.
Re:Handful of Biologists Went Rogue and Published Directly t...
by dekhn on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @07:55PM
(#11293970)
Yeah, some form of enhanced markdown, with self-rendering papers on github (or whatever-hub or whatever-xiv) seems like a very practical solution. It couples the paper's representation to the version control system in a way that could be convenient and expressive.
Re:Handful of Biologists Went Rogue and Published Directly t...
by dorfsmay on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @02:03AM
(#11295357)
Markdown gets very limited very quickly.
Are you aware of pandoc?
I am certainly aware that many scientists don't want to publish their code out of embarrassment. It was a surprise to me, but I've heard that feedback.
I investigated various alternatives after I found LaTeX too arcane, including DocBook. It's still not entirely clear what solution exists to the collection of problems I have (want to semantically mark up my paper, want it to display nicely regardless of screen, etc).