Re:AlphaGo Beats Lee Sedol in Final Game
by carleverett on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @12:22PM
(#11290780)
I don't know if it would be that bizarre. Once AlphaGo can beat the best humans on Earth, what motivation is there to keep improving it? Wasn't that the goal of the project?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Advances in deep learning in general should apply here, and there's a big motivation to keep improving that. Also, Go is popular enough that it should experience the same sort of commoditization drive that advanced Chess engines did, where Deep Blue level play went from being on a supercomputer to being on a smartphone. Then, since this approach scales up with more computing power, running a hypothetical future smartphone-Go engine on a big cluster like AlphaGo has here should put it way beyond the human level.
AlphaGo is still a monstrosity in terms of the hardware it requires. Improvements in AlphaGo will be reflected in the fact that it or something like it will soon sit on a tiny little computer near you. See also: what happened after the chess world champion lost to a computer.