Re:February breaks global temperature records by 'shocking' ...
by marcus_holmes on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @05:46AM
(#11288496)
There have been a couple of articles talking about the rapid change coming out of the ice age recently. I didn't bookmark them because who has time for that? But I'm not making this up randomly ;)
Feel free to ignore the point and my comment if you feel it insufficiently supported by peer-reviewed articles.
I'm sorry I'm unable to assist your learning by giving you a solid reference.
Re:February breaks global temperature records by 'shocking' ...
by Oletros on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @11:57AM
(#11290567)
Well, as far as I know,. all the articles I have read say exactly the contrary, that the rate now is a lot faster than the one coming out from the ice age. Is because of that I ask your sources.
From [0]: > As the Earth moved out of ice ages over the past million years, the global temperature rose a total of 4 to 7 degrees Celsius over about 5,000 years. In the past century alone, the temperature has climbed 0.7 degrees Celsius, roughly ten times faster than the average rate of ice-age-recovery warming. [0] http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page...
Re:February breaks global temperature records by 'shocking' ...
by marcus_holmes on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @07:56PM
(#11293973)
well, 20 seconds googling turned this up:
http://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/abrupt-clim...
Quote from the abstract: "One of the most surprising findings was that the shifts from cold stadials to the warm interstadial intervals occurred in a matter of decades, with air temperatures over Greenland rapidly warming 8 to 15°C"
Re:February breaks global temperature records by 'shocking' ...
by Oletros on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @02:58PM
(#11299806)
DO cycles didn't changed the Earth global mean temperature, they are regional changes.
Re:February breaks global temperature records by 'shocking' ...
by marcus_holmes on Wednesday March 16, 2016 @06:41PM
(#11301249)
The "global mean temperature" is a statistical construct. It doesn't actually exist as a thing that can kill animals and plants. They only get to experience actual temperatures, and are clearly able to adapt to rapid changes in actual temperatures.
Do you have a source for that?