News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A previously unnoticed property of prime numbers by aidos on Monday March 14, 2016 @11:59AM (#11283579)
I'd guess the GP was pointing out that there are uninteresting results that those less qualified in maths see as some sort of magic. Maybe like those silly "choose any number multiply by x, etc etc did you get 7, magic!" games. Or:

    9*9+7 = 88
    98*9+6 = 888
    987*9+5 = 8888
While not exactly trivial, and there's still maths required to understand the patterns, this prime result is much deeper and more interesting. The GP almost passed over it because they though it might fall into the less interesting category.
Re:A previously unnoticed property of prime numbers by kafkaesq on Monday March 14, 2016 @04:06PM (#11285179)
Right, but the result in original article is clearly not in this category.