It seems to me that homeschooling is a great option for kids well away from the mean of the 'bell curve' - in either direction. It's difficult for the schools to properly handle kids that are far from normal. So for the kid who just needs to learn life skills as well as the kid who is taking the college physics class at 15 years old home schooling seems like a reasonable choice- if the parents are up to it.
I think tokenadult has a lot of interesting insight on this subject.
Also, why should it be only the one or the other? These are not mutually exclusive. Personally, I went to school and I was homeschooled at the same time.
Removing regular school from the equation is almost always a bad idea.
What do you mean 'ignore'? If children are forced to go to school, they can hardly 'ignore' that they are being bullied or 'just go away' if a teachers is incompetent.
Most children are perfectly capable of identifying the flaws, they are just impotent and can't do anything about it which causes additional misery.
If they don't know how to handle those things then maybe: 1) they should have thought better before deciding to have children and 2) seek help on how to raise them?
We used to live in the fucking jungle and you think that today's society is cruel? What's the matter with you people?
True. Some parents see those problems and deal with them by, for example, homeschooling their children.
Homeschooling doesn't strike as a thing an 'incapable' parent would choose to do. It takes deliberate thought and lots of work.
Ideally, the parents will choose the method that lets their child learn most effectively. In reality, some of them will make bad choices and stunt their children's education. Which sucks, but life is not fair.
And by the way, who's preventing you to teach your children to identify(and thus ignore) the flaws of this system?
What you're suggesting is the nuclear option and I don't see any reason for that.