News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MH370 Debris Storm by anexprogrammer on Friday March 11, 2016 @02:13AM (#11265148)
Going on what we know (sod all), it seems just as likely that the lack of barnacles is down to different materials between the pieces.

Maybe some pieces are too smooth or the wrong flavour? The photo with barnacles attached seems to show them aggregating on the framework and edges only, so maybe they just don't like the paint.

I'd expect a lot of parts to show up together due to the action of tides and currents.

Re:MH370 Debris Storm by hanoz on Friday March 11, 2016 @10:12AM (#11267024)
I'm no expert, but I've seen plenty of flotsam and jetsam on beaches in my time, and I can't recall seeing a barnacle on any of it.
Re:MH370 Debris Storm by madaxe_again on Friday March 11, 2016 @07:36AM (#11266222)
Barnacles tend to aggregate on pretty much anything - smooth or no. Talk to any boat owner.

The only reason they'd be barnacle free is if the paint is in some way ablative, and comes off in layers - which is how marine anti-barnacle paint works - it's very unlikely they'd lack them otherwise.

Re:MH370 Debris Storm by dhimes on Friday March 11, 2016 @08:48AM (#11266548)
There is also paint that is poisonous to the barnacles- that's how anti-barnacle paint used to work in the marine industry. But having all of that poison (for example, lead was famously used back in the day) was determined to not be good for the our environmental health.

Since planes are in a different environment, it's possible that they use paint that is toxic to barnacles (but perhaps is otherwise unsuitable as marine bottom paint).

Re:MH370 Debris Storm by inanutshellus on Friday March 11, 2016 @11:59AM (#11267771)
I always put anti-barnacle paint on my airplanes. Those things are terrible for aerodynamic flow and seriously increase drag. ;-)
Re:MH370 Debris Storm by madaxe_again on Friday March 11, 2016 @10:15AM (#11267036)
That's true - fair point.
Re:MH370 Debris Storm by huuu on Friday March 11, 2016 @02:49AM (#11265284)
My first thought was that maybe breaker waves cleaned up the found parts just like in tumble cleaners.