AlphaGo beats Lee Sedol again in match 2 of 5

Re:AlphaGo beats Lee Sedol again in match 2 of 5 by boucher on Thursday March 10, 2016 @08:38AM (#11259075)

And yet the operative fact is that a human could not execute those calculations in a lifetime.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AlphaGo beats Lee Sedol again in match 2 of 5 by EliRivers on Thursday March 10, 2016 @08:46AM (#11259127)

So what? Doesn't change the facts. There is no child here. There is a set of deterministic calculations written by some people, and executed.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AlphaGo beats Lee Sedol again in match 2 of 5 by alphydan on Thursday March 10, 2016 @10:49AM (#11259863)

I agree with EliRivers.

I'm pretty sure that if I wrote a child from scratch (AGCTTAACGGUAA ... etc), understood the underlying mechanisms connecting proteins to wining a baseball tournament ... I should get some credit for the win :)

There is no insight in making a child (can be done totally drunk and half passed out), although there is some in education.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AlphaGo beats Lee Sedol again in match 2 of 5 by botw on Thursday March 10, 2016 @11:40AM (#11260209)

please give the definition for a set of deterministic calculations.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AlphaGo beats Lee Sedol again in match 2 of 5 by EliRivers on Friday March 11, 2016 @05:04AM (#11265713)

Are you serious? You want me to tell you what calculations are? Having trouble using google with those flippers, I expect.

[ Parent | on HN ]