News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AlphaGo Can't Beat Me, Says Chinese Go Grandmaster Ke Jie by kerkeslager on Thursday March 10, 2016 @08:32AM (#11259039)
I'd describe that a little differently: I think AlphGo's choosing safer moves shows strength. In go you don't get any extra credit for winning by more; a win by 0.5 is equivalent to a win by 50.5. As such there is no incentive to fight for wins at a higher margin. If a more aggressive move is riskier or harder to read (it usually is) there is actually a disincentive to play it. I can't tell you how many games I've lost because I misread a complicated variation which I could have avoided entirely when I was ahead.
Re:AlphaGo Can't Beat Me, Says Chinese Go Grandmaster Ke Jie by tyh on Thursday March 10, 2016 @10:43AM (#11259818)
>"a win by 0.5 is equivalent to a win by 50.5 It don't matter if you win by an inch or a mile. Winning's winning."

Which reminds me of some wisdom from Dominic Toretto "It don't matter if you win by an inch or a mile. Winning's winning."

Re:AlphaGo Can't Beat Me, Says Chinese Go Grandmaster Ke Jie by SixSigma on Thursday March 10, 2016 @11:45AM (#11260256)
“The secret [to motor racing]”, said Niki Lauda, “is to win going as slowly as possible”
Re:AlphaGo Can't Beat Me, Says Chinese Go Grandmaster Ke Jie by hodwik on Thursday March 10, 2016 @08:40AM (#11259087)
>"I can't tell you how many games I've lost because I misread a complicated variation which I could have avoided entirely when I was ahead."

Isn't that Go in a nutshell though.